TOKYO (Reuters) – Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, buoyed by a huge election win for lawmakers who favor revising Japan’s post-war, pacifist constitution, is likely to push towards his long-held goal but will need to convince a divided public to succeed.

Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, leader of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), puts a rosette next to his name after the lower house election, at the LDP headquarters in Tokyo, Japan, October 22, 2017. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon

Parties in favor of amending the U.S.-drafted charter won nearly 80 percent of the seats in Sunday’s lower house election, media counts showed. Four seats remain to be called and final figures are expected later on Monday.

That left the small, new Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ) as the biggest group opposed to Abe’s proposed changes.

Formed by liberal members of the Democratic Party, which no longer exists in the lower house, it won 54 seats, a fraction of the ruling bloc’s two-thirds majority in the 465-member chamber.

Abe said he wanted to get other parties, including Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike’s new conservative Party of Hope, on board and was not insisting on a target of changing the constitution by 2020 that he floated earlier this year.

“First, I want to deepen debate and have as many people as possible agree,” he told a Japanese broadcaster late on Sunday.

“We should put priority on that.”

Amending the charter’s pacifist Article 9 would be hugely symbolic for Japan. Supporters see it as the foundation of post-war democracy but many conservatives view it as a humiliating imposition after Japan’s defeat in 1945.

It would also be a victory for Abe, whose conservative agenda of restoring traditional values, stressing obligations to the state over individual rights and loosening constraints on the military, centers on revising the constitution.

“Mr. Abe is trying to create a legacy. His first legacy project was to get the economy out of deflation,” said Jesper Koll, head of equities fund WisdomTree Japan.

“The second legacy is to change the constitution,” he said. “You can debate whether he has a mandate but what will make or break him … is the constitutional issue.”

Any revision of the constitution requires support from two-thirds of the members of each chamber of parliament and a majority in a public referendum, with no minimum quorum.

PUBLIC DIVIDED

“I think that debate in parliament will begin,” said Zentaro Kamei, a senior researcher at think tank PHP Institute and a former lawmaker in Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

“But the reason given for this snap election was Abe’s proposal to change what sales tax hike revenues would be used for. If he starts talking about the constitution, people will say, ‘you didn’t ask me that’,” Zentaro said.

Abe proposed last May adding a clause to Article 9 to legitimize Japan’s Self-Defence Force. Read literally, Article 9 bans a standing military but has been interpreted to allow armed forces exclusively for self defense.

Parliament enacted laws in 2015 allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense, or aid allies under attack, based on a reinterpretation of the constitution rather than a formal revision.

Critics, including CDPJ leader Yukio Edano, say those laws violate the constitution.

The LDP’s junior partner, the Komeito, is cautious about revising Article 9, perhaps even more so after signs that some of its dovish supporters had voted for the CDPJ. It also believes that the biggest opposition party should agree with the proposed changes.

Opinion polls show the public is divided on Abe’s proposal. An NHK survey before the election showed 32 percent in favor, 21 percent opposed, and 39 percent unsure.

Media exit polls showed that, despite the LDP’s big win, 51 percent of voters don’t trust the prime minister, a hangover from suspected cronyism scandals that eroded his support earlier this year and a potential risk if a referendum is held.

Reporting by Linda Sieg; Editing by Paul Tait

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Read More

Powered by WPeMatico